![]() Video Card2: AMD Radeon RX470 4GB VRAM (Driver Version 22.Q3.Oct / 6.3) Pond5 page: My Stock Footage of Bandung city Personal FB | Personal IG | Personal YT ChannelĬhungs Video FB | Chungs Video IG | Chungs Video YT Channel I think it would be disastrous for Sony to pit itself against the high end such as Adobe and AVID at a time when the software industry is giving more away for less.īandung, West Java, Indonesia (UTC+7 Time Area) ![]() There is always going to be a trade off between price and features. The argument that users of this forum are disregarding the needs of those who wish to see a Sony version of AVID might be true but is that not a reflection of the average user of Vegas? If this is about Sony making money off Vegas so it may continue to thrive then surely it needs to cater for the majority not simply those who want AVID features which come with an AVID price tag? I bought Vegas because it was cheaper than the rest but still pro feature friendly. It's possible that getting Vegas to play nice with CUDA might be a waste of time and resources but there's no reason why effective media management tools can't (or haven't) been integrated. Personally I don't use these kind of tools but I'm not opposed to them being integrated into Vegas. For example I don't use Adobe Bridge but maybe a company that deals with thousands of media files a day might find it useful for renaming batches of files and other tasks. ![]() I nearly always switch them off whether they are in Vegas, Windows or other software. While I understand the need for more effective importing and transcoding I really dislike media organising tools such as the old media manager which I find unintuitive and intrusive. I assume users want the ease of importing and editing their media in Vegas, also the ability to transcode media and then organise it clearly and effectively. Media management can mean a number of things depending on the expectations of the user.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |